
For both cohorts, in Seoul and in Busan, day two of the training was a Bana vibe coding hackathon.
Each teacher brought out a problem that had always nagged at them (lesson prep, student activities, assessment)
and turned it into a working web tool that same day.
On day two of an industry-linked informatics teacher training, Bana ran a vibe coding hackathon. In August 2026, 148 informatics teachers took part across two cohorts, in Seoul (Aug 3–4) and Busan (Aug 13–14): 109 in Seoul and 39 in Busan. Bana instructors and mentors were on site.
Day two ran from 9 AM to 6 PM. In the morning, teachers opened Bana for the first time and turned recurring classroom worries into tool ideas. From 1 PM to 4:30 PM they built their tools with instructors and mentors alongside them. The last session was for showing the tools and talking about using them in class.
Each teacher's topic came from their own classroom: lesson prep, student activities, learning materials, and assessment. 190 projects across five tracks were published to the Bana gallery, and twelve of them are featured on this page, including a Python tutor, a flowchart tool, a tool that turns official notices into a schedule, and an AI ethics debate tool.
The whole second day of the two-day residential training went to this.
They opened Bana for the first time in the morning, and by evening they were looking at the tools they had made together.
Opening Bana for the first time, turning a recurring classroom worry into a tool idea
A short break
Instructors and mentors alongside them at every sticking point
Showing the tools and talking about using them in class
Lesson prep, student activities, learning materials, assessment. Each of them brought out the worry they had kept putting off.
The goal was not to stop at trying AI out, but to plan and build a tool that fits their own teaching.
Twelve picked from the 190 projects published across five tracks.
Hover to pause, and click a card to see it in detail above.












What follows is not a transcript of an actual interview; it is a staff commentary reconstructed from the training’s operating records and what we observed on site.
We will replace it with real quotes once we have an interview with the teachers in charge.
It felt less like a training course than a workshop.
The explanations were kept short, and most of the day went to each of them building.
Building
Signing in and the tutorial
Looking together
Everyone’s own workbench
Presenting and sharingFrom schools and districts to corporate training and workforce programs, tell us the size and the dates and we'll build the rest around them.
Leave a message and we'll reply within one business day.
We'll be in touch within one business day.